Synthesise And Collate

There are many types of outputs that use evidence synthesis, such as policy briefs, systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and so on.

There are many types of outputs that use evidence synthesis, such as policy briefs, systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and so on.Synthesis methods can include bringing together published and grey literature and stakeholder input.

Tags: Vietnamese Culture EssaySense Of Place EssayOwl Purdue Process EssaySocial Work Continuing Education CoursesWriting A Reaction Paper1 000 Word Essay Is How Many PagesParis Essay In French

Consider publishing your protocol in a journal such as Systematic reviews or registering it with the PROSPERO database.

The EPPI-Centre has an online database of systematic reviews which can be searched here.

While realist methods have been successfully used to understand the effectiveness of policies and programmes, to inform intervention design and development, we believe the overall logic of realist explanation can also be used to better understand the implementation and effective delivery of complex health interventions and programmes.

After introducing the fundamentals of realist inquiry, and the approach of realist synthesis, we will present our realist synthesis of the implementation of health promotion in schools.

The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health research by promoting transparent and accurate reporting and wider used of robust reporting guidelines.

They publish reporting standards for all kinds of study designs and are a useful resource for critical appraisal techniques.There are a number of resources to help support the translation of systematic reviews into policy decisions, but a useful guide is this report by the Alliance for Useful Evidence.It is a short introduction for decision-makers and researchers or anyone else considering whether a systematic review may be appropriate to fill a gap in knowledge or to use as a resource.The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (short GRADE) working group began in the year 2000 as an informal collaboration of people with an interest in addressing the shortcomings of grading systems in health care.The working group has developed a common, sensible and transparent approach to grading quality (or certainty) of evidence and strength of recommendations.It will help anybody planning on commissioning a review of what research is already out there.For the coders, the SR Toolbox is a hub that brings together code and tools used by software developers with a specific interest in systematic reviews.For syntheses in which each intervention may differ from another (in sometimes unknown ways), they are less suitable.By contrast, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), an approach which has recently been employed in systematic reviews, makes use of the inherent variance in complex interventions.They also have many methodological publications covering topics such as user involvement, text mining, information management, searching and synthesising studies, quality and critical appraisal, and using evidence.Moving from systematic review evidence to making recommendations is not a straightforward process.