An argument from evil claims that because evil exists, either God does not exist or does not have all three of those properties.
Attempts to show the contrary have traditionally been discussed under the heading of theodicy.
The most weighty of the arguments against God’s existence is the problem of evil.
Of all the atheistic arguments, this is the one that has been around for longest, that has had the most words written about it, and that draws the most diverse responses from Christians.
The problem of evil however is only a challenge for the religious, for atheists this is not an issue as they do not believe in a God who should be responsible for it, the existence of evil is the biggest destroyer of the belief in God.
Problem Of Evil Argument Essay Ethnic Restaurant Business Plan
B) Are the theodicies' attempts to deal with moral and natural evil and suffering doomed, in the face of so much evil and suffering? Conclusion A criticism to Leibniz's theodicy comes from Voltaire, a French writer. The logical form of the argument tries to show a logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil, Responses to various versions of the problem of evil, meanwhile, come in three forms: refutations, defenses, and theodicies.A wide range of responses have been made against these arguments.Moral evil defines the bad actions of us as humans such as: rape, theft and murder, where as Natural evil makes reference to the natural processes of the world such as: volcanoes, earthquakes and forest fires, it is said that as humans commit such atrocities as murder through moral evil , natural evil occurs as punishment. Middle the fawn endures is pointless , yet it is nature , surely a wholly good God would end this suffering quickly as it is pointless.To conclude, the problem of evil lies in that devoted theists such as Christians and Muslims believe in a God who possesses all of the divine attributes and yet suffering is so prominent , they believe in such a God regardless of what evil may strike them in their lifetimes yet surely their God would protect the devotee from having to experience such pain.In making the world, God faced a choice: he could create free agents like us, or he could create automata, robots, without the ability to make choices of their own.God chose to create free agents, and he made the right choice; a world containing free agents is clearly more valuable than a world of robots.In brief, the problem is this: The traditional conception of God is as omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful), and benevolent.This implies that if God exists then he knows how to, wants to, and is able to prevent all suffering.Much of the evil in the world occurs only because we choose to create it.The greatest evils in the world are those inflicted by man upon man.