Tags: Umi Doctoral DissertationsCommunications Technology EssayUc Application Personal Statement 2013Essay On Arrange MarriagesOutline Examples For EssaysTop Research Paper TopicsIraq War Research PaperHow Do You Start A Conclusion Paragraph For An EssayLesson Plan For Creative WritingEssay Scams Frauds Corporate World
“Why engage in such rank (though well-concealed) hypocrisy?
As we enter the usual period of anxiety around General Convention, my prayer is that we remember that we need not be a house divided, but rather we are a Church built on the foundation of unity, even in disagreement, that our Savior prayed and ultimately died for.
Or we might say in a network-centric world: a society divided between those who manage surveillance, intrusion and data-mining on behalf of the rest of us – and the rest of us, who lack access to the output of that universal engine – will not last forever.
When Lincoln states that the temperance revolution is in some ways even greater than the political revolution of 1776, he is being disingenuous.
When Lincoln welcomes the reign of reason and mind over appetite and intemperance, he is being ironic.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 License. This engaging book presents intelligently chosen examples of Lincoln’s main speeches and writings, each of which is followed by an interpretive essay.
Please contact [email protected] use this work in a way not covered by the license. Lowenthal, a professor emeritus of political science at Boston College, is the author of (Cambridge, 1985), both of which in different ways reveal the power of the past, but here he eschews a historical approach.Occasionally, one interpretive essay will refer to other Lincoln writings, but there is relatively little sustained attempt to illuminate one text by the light of another. Lowenthal’s main interest is on Lincoln’s early years.The “Perpetuation Address” of 1838 receives about fourteen pages of interpretation, while the eight Civil War speeches together receive about twenty-two pages.The “House Divided” speech of 1858 elicits a two-page essay, as does the 1863 letter to Conkling.As the author admits, some of the essays tend toward summary (5).We’re talking about the ripening of a surveillance society that suggests that even prophets like Orwell, Huxley, and Philip K.Dick were not sufficiently paranoid to prepare us for the twenty-first century.He argues, rather convincingly, I think, that it is precisely because of the place of warring groups within The Episcopal Church that we are not divided, but rather models of what it means to be in relationship despite disagreement.“It is because of its having gradually acquired, during a long history, this inclusive character, that the Episcopal Church is able without immodesty to volunteer its good offices in that effort to come to a better understanding which so many souls in all the communions are earnestly desirous of seeing set on foot.Those who have access to information and know what to do with it are free. Transparency of political and economic processes is the only way to ensure accountability, but we live in a world in which transparency is increasingly a one-way street.The power to drill down into the data, map patterns and see deviations, the ability to see, period, is vested in fewer and fewer people, the Keepers of the Real, those who Know.