Huntington's thesis was often abused in this context and cited as the academic evidence for Muslim hostility.Does any of this amount to a clash of civilisations?The bloodiest battles take place within civilisations, not between them – Africans kill Africans in the Congo, Muslims murder Muslims in Egypt, and the civil war in Syria has claimed more victims than the US invasion of Iraq.Tags: Free Narrative EssayPhd Dissertations Business AdministrationHow To Write Results Section Of Research Paper In PsychologyEssays Micro TeachingEndangered Species Essay ConclusionProfessional Cover Letter Administrative Assistant Position
"Today, twenty years after the publication, it is time to recognise that the "Clash" thesis was simply wrong," writes Nicolas Richter Though many people regarded his thesis as rather abstruse, the essay soon came to be regarded as a classic.
In the wake of the Al Qaeda attacks of 2001, the criticism abated when, to many, it seemed that perhaps Huntington had been the only one perceptive enough to discern the true future course of events. It soon became clear that those who saw Al Qaeda as the representatives of Muslim civilisation had simply been duped by its propaganda.
In general, this thinking in terms of blocs is incompatible with today's interconnected world in which even rival nations such as the US and China are heavily dependent on one another.
Of course, the most telling evidence that Huntington got it wrong is provided by the fact that the culture clash between his rival blocs has failed to materialise.
It is likely that all those for whom the global markets remain elusively out of reach, or those who consider them as decadent, will continue to turn to violence in the future.
It is also likely that the violence will get worse as weapons, poisons and viruses become easier to get hold of. Osama bin Laden may have liked to see himself as the avenger of all the wrongs perpetrated against Muslims, but he never succeeded in unifying the Muslims between Morocco and Indonesia far less mould them into a geo-strategic power.An ever greater number of countries participate in the game of globalisation; they are competing with one another for food, water, raw materials, weapons, investment, interest rates and Formula 1 circuits.Countries engage in struggle for worldly things – there is not a lot of room left for God.It is obvious today that the world is in an even bigger mess than Huntington could ever have realised.A commentary from Nicolas Richter published an article entitled "The Clash of Civilisations? In the article American scholar Samuel Huntington ventured a prognosis: neither economy nor ideology were the factors that would divide mankind and bring future conflict, but rather civilization.Or is it just another form of the age old xenophobia and distrust only too familiar to illegal Latino immigrants in the US?Does the fact that Turkey has – rightly – remained an EU candidate not in itself refute the notion of a clash?Quote from "The Clash of Civilizations": "The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism.It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power." Pictured: A former Taliban fighter who joined Afghan government forces Elsewhere, particularly in countries with young populations, religious belief is likely to foment violence for a long time to come, and the terror committed in the name of God is not going to disappear either.The Clash of Civilisations would bring about a division between East and West.Or so went the thesis put forward twenty years ago by the American political scientist Samuel P. His essay was to become a classic – but it would also be abused to stir up hatred against Muslims.